Awareness is a fundamental property of Ultimate-self, and is the back-flow of Will entering creation-templates (this applies in the Substrate and at the deepest levels of creation . . . later versions of surface-level creation-templates such as those in Magick-Universe don’t work the same way).
Since all existence is formed from Creation-templates, awareness applies everywhere. Ideas like awareness being top-down only, are false.
Awareness is very different from intellectual Understanding (which uses models and symbols as a substitute for contact with objective reality). Awareness is also different from perception (such as that which is done by the body senses, energy-body interactions or mechanical devices) which is the formation of models from interactions between Playing-field contents . . . the fact that “optical illusions” result in incorrect models, make it clear that it is models which are built by perception, not the direct contact with objective reality which awareness provides.
Knowing is the result of awareness.
While it’s sometimes necessary to use temporary fixed definitions in order to make a start on processing an area, stable data is non-ideals, used to hold back confusions, so the confusions and other relevant such non-ideals should be handled as soon as possible so that one gets better direct awareness of relevant areas.
Increasing awareness is an essential part of advanced stages of improving one’s spiritual condition. It’s not possible to detail, using linear writing and fixed rules, the wholistic and uniquely individual nature of what really needs to be done to get a being free of limitations, thus awareness (whether one’s own or someone else’s) is the only option for significant progress in that direction. Effective processing will increase awareness (although there are other factors).
The main mechanism of making beings decay (in order to manifest a wider variety of creations, which is the aim of this group of about 5 million Universe-chains) is to get beings to avoid awareness of areas they dislike. (This can be seen as another perspective on what the above paragraph says).
Most people have some degree of awareness of their own personal models of past incidents and other non-ideals, as well as their personal-models of “reality”, but don’t have awareness of objective reality until they’ve done lots of effective processing. It is easy to determine whether one has awareness of objective reality. For example, flip a coin in the air and catch it between your hands, and use your awareness to determine if it’s a head or tail, then check with your body’s eyes. Do that ten times in a row, and if you get ten out of ten correct, you’ve got general awareness of objective reality, otherwise you haven’t.
Some spiritual traditions train a person to develop awareness in specific areas (such as specific energy-bodies used in that tradition), but are not efficient in developing more general awareness.
Direct awareness of objective reality is obviously very different from use of one’s models of it. For example, there are no solid objects in the Physical-universe Playing-field . . . real awareness shows it being made entirely of slowly moving temporary bright golden particles.
Awareness of objective reality is also observable when two or more beings with a significant degree of awareness communicate about reality (or look at each other’s data) . . . they will see the same things (since they are both looking at the same objective reality). They may see something from different perspectives and be making different assumptions about it, and might have very different opinions about other things, but it will be obvious that they are seeing the same reality (in contrast to people using their models). I have been lucky enough to participate in a small ongoing group of people who have good awareness, which has helped me towards awareness and understanding of data and processes I make available (and recommend) on this and my other two websites.
Awareness requires a differential . . . attention which is doing something on automatic cannot be aware of what it is doing (getting it to do so converts it to a Beingness, which is no longer Doing). This differential is usually distance, but can be other things, for example, getting good reality on Being in another Chain of universes results in better awareness of this Chain of universes, more so than a greater distance does, because the differential is greater.
The concept of differential is reflected in the fact that attention-units doing a fixed task can be aware when they have 2 or more anchor-points (i.e. are raised above 2.0 on the scale of created things). Thus beginners typically find it easier to be aware of the higher end of things, due to them having most of their attention on/as Case (fixed tasks) . . . free attention-units (which are not doing a fixed task, i.e. not being a creation), are aware of the whole range of things (over the entire scale of created things and beyond) since they are effectively not on the scale of created things.
Some relevant advanced processes . . .
Process for problems
Maximilian Sandor
Apr 24 2017
- look at a problem
- what distance is it at in your perception space?
- slowly pierce THROUGH the problem to the other side until the same distance
related problems with larger distances and higher on the tone scale will become visible and one can work with those to increase one’s space..
One could say that one’s perceptional space is limited by the problems they encircle.
mx
From: Chris Melchior
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020
Subject: Hidden Non-ideals
Investigating what causes most Non-ideals to be unavailable to process at the
current time, I find decisions to not be aware of whole areas.
So they cannot be processed in present time initially, BUT it’s easy enough
to go back in time to just before the decision to not be aware of them, and
run the making of that decision as an incident, then erase the decision,
and any avoidance etc.
For me, I have to word the search question in terms of finding things that
I am not aware of currently, that I chose to be unaware of in the past,
because if I just ask for things I chose to be unaware of in the past, I
find things that I have already regained awareness of.
Chris
From: ChrisMelchior
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020
Subject: Complete enough view
If one gets a complete enough view of things (and fully facing reality), relevant
Non-ideals cease to exist. This can include both poles of relevant polarities,
sources, origins, templates and the act of copying the Non-ideals from elsewhere,
MFs, flows of intention, history, etc. etc.
i.e. all use of Non-ideals is based on limited awareness of relevant context.
Chris